Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn, the party of hungry children Ian McDonald skrifar 22. mars 2024 12:31 Now that some time has passed since the new collective agreement was signed between the broad alliance of trade unions, Samtök Atvinnulífsins and the Icelandic government. The dust has settled, people have had the chance to read and understand the substance of the agreement and how it will help working people over the coming years. This agreement promises to inject substantial amounts of tax-free disposable income into the pockets of working-class individuals and families, by increasing child benefit payments, lowering housing costs, lowering the cost of living by ensuring that the government reduces interest rates, and not least of all by making primary school meals free. It is on this last point that there has been objection to, particularly from Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn, and specifically (and vocally) from Oli Björn Kárason, a high-ranking member of the party. My immediate reaction to hearing that a member of the independence party doesn´t believe that it is the responsibility of the state to.....feed children..... was just a sigh and a shrug. But of course. That fits entirely with the ethos and brutal austerity politics of his chosen ideology. But then I thought a little deeper. This is a man who has been in the highest levels of Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn for a very long time. He has stuck with them through scandal after scandal, corruption, nepotism, public embarrasments and illegality. Through rampant cuts to public services and the measurable worsening of quality of life for the people he is paid to serve. And through all that, this man has held his tongue and not raised his head above the parapet. But the issue of ensuring that children have full bellies and that their families do not have to worry about the spiralling cost of meals is apparently one that he is willing to stand up in public and voice his opposition to. This is something that Óli Björn (and others) are willing to go on the record against and mark his part in Icelandic political history. To not believe that feeding children should be accepted as a bare minumum standard of care and decency in our society. That parents who are already struggling to make ends meet should be forced to scrape and save what little disposable income they have to ensure that their children aren‘t going hungry. And if they can´t afford it? Well i guess then work two jobs and pay the difference? I am well aware that the objections to increases in welfare such as this are always dressed up in political language, jargon and double-speak. The implication that somehow the Icelandic government does not have the money for this, or that it will result in inevitable cuts elsewhere. The debate surrounding free school meals for children is not merely a matter of economics; it's a litmus test for the moral conscience of our leaders. Yet, time and again, we see certain politicians barricading themselves behind bureaucratic jargon and hollow justifications, conveniently forgetting the dire realities faced by countless families struggling to put food on the table. These politicians, ensconced in their ivory towers of privilege, fail to comprehend the harsh truth that for many children, the school lunch may be their only nutritious meal of the day. By denying them this basic necessity, these politicians are complicit in perpetuating a cycle of poverty and hunger that stifles the potential of entire generations. Let's be unequivocal: objecting to free school meals for children is not a political stance; it's a moral failing. It's a betrayal of the fundamental duty of elected officials to safeguard the welfare of their constituents, especially the most marginalized among them. As a British ex-pat, my mind is inevitably drawn to comparisons with my native country, where during the covid-19 lockdowns, the Conservative government refused to feed children who were in lockdown and could not attend school. In that case it took a premier league footballer who started a public awareness campaign to pressure the government into sending food to hungry children. And yes. That is just as dystopian as it sounds. Make no mistake, that same ideaolgy is at work here, Sjalfstæðisflokkurinn are simply a bit further up the road than the British Conservative party. But the end point is the same. As citizens, we must hold these politicians accountable for their abhorrent stance on free school meals. We must demand that they prioritize humanity over politics, empathy over ideology. We must remind them that their duty is to serve the people, not their own self-interests. The author is a manufacturing worker. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Kynntu þér reglur ritstjórnar um skoðanagreinar. Senda grein Kjaraviðræður 2023-24 Mest lesið Slaufun, skautun, skömmun Örn Bárður Jónsson Skoðun Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir Skoðun Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson Skoðun Verðbólgan er stærsti einstaki uppruni hagnaðar á Íslandi Egill Almar Ágústsson Skoðun Að skilja, eða skilja ekki, umræðuna Lúðvík Bergvinsson Skoðun NEI! Atlaga að lýðræði og svipting kosningaréttar Magnús Jónsson Skoðun Grein fyrir óákveðna kjósendur og nei-sinna Magnea Marinósdóttir Skoðun „Vilja til að ganga í Evrópusambandið“ Hjörtur J. Guðmundsson Skoðun Fullveldi þjóðar og frelsi einstaklings Pétur B. Sveinsson Skoðun Er Marta Kos einnig að plata?.. en það má ekki plata Júlíus Valsson Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Kerfislægt virðingarleysi – Þegar sparað er í velferð en verðmæti sameignar renna annað Sigurður Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Rífum í lóðin Karólína Helga Símonardóttir skrifar Skoðun Maðurinn einn er ei nema hálfur – með öðrum er hann meiri en hann sjálfur Kristín Bjarnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Slaufun, skautun, skömmun Örn Bárður Jónsson skrifar Skoðun When Path Dependence Becomes an Argument for Saying No Erna Bjarnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Grein fyrir óákveðna kjósendur og nei-sinna Magnea Marinósdóttir skrifar Skoðun Fullveldi þjóðar og frelsi einstaklings Pétur B. Sveinsson skrifar Skoðun „Vilja til að ganga í Evrópusambandið“ Hjörtur J. Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson skrifar Skoðun Að skilja, eða skilja ekki, umræðuna Lúðvík Bergvinsson skrifar Skoðun NEI! Atlaga að lýðræði og svipting kosningaréttar Magnús Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Verðbólgan er stærsti einstaki uppruni hagnaðar á Íslandi Egill Almar Ágústsson skrifar Skoðun Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Síli veidd í skólpi Jónas Már Torfason ,Eydís Inga Valsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Er Marta Kos einnig að plata?.. en það má ekki plata Júlíus Valsson skrifar Skoðun Ég skil ekki nei fólk Einar Steinþórsson skrifar Skoðun Heildarkostnaður aðildarviðræðna gæti samsvarað 300–700 kr. á mann á mánuði Valur Þráinsson skrifar Skoðun Erfingjar og erfðarmál Guðmunda G. Guðmundsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þögnin rofin Gunnar Salvarsson skrifar Skoðun Fullveldi, yfirþjóðlegar stofnanir og jafnræðisgrundvöllur í Evrópu Maximilian Conrad skrifar Skoðun Fimmtugt er ekki biðstofa Sigurður Árni Reynisson skrifar Skoðun Horfum á heildarmyndina – og til lengri tíma Kolbrún Halldórsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvar hefur 400.000 manna þjóð mest áhrif? Baldur Johnsen skrifar Skoðun Hvernig ákveður þjóð sig? - Samhygð á undanhaldi Davíð Brynjar Sigurjónsson skrifar Skoðun Siðferðiskirtillinn Jón Bragi Gunnlaugsson skrifar Skoðun Spörum milljarða Lárus Blöndal Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Drottningaviðtal – þegar ein rödd fær sviðið Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þegar náttúran verður okkur framandi Guðný Þorsteinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þurfum við kreatín og prótín sem bætiefni? Jóhanna Eyrún Torfadóttir,Dögg Guðmundsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Af hverju aðildarviðræður? Björn Leví Gunnarsson skrifar Sjá meira
Now that some time has passed since the new collective agreement was signed between the broad alliance of trade unions, Samtök Atvinnulífsins and the Icelandic government. The dust has settled, people have had the chance to read and understand the substance of the agreement and how it will help working people over the coming years. This agreement promises to inject substantial amounts of tax-free disposable income into the pockets of working-class individuals and families, by increasing child benefit payments, lowering housing costs, lowering the cost of living by ensuring that the government reduces interest rates, and not least of all by making primary school meals free. It is on this last point that there has been objection to, particularly from Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn, and specifically (and vocally) from Oli Björn Kárason, a high-ranking member of the party. My immediate reaction to hearing that a member of the independence party doesn´t believe that it is the responsibility of the state to.....feed children..... was just a sigh and a shrug. But of course. That fits entirely with the ethos and brutal austerity politics of his chosen ideology. But then I thought a little deeper. This is a man who has been in the highest levels of Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn for a very long time. He has stuck with them through scandal after scandal, corruption, nepotism, public embarrasments and illegality. Through rampant cuts to public services and the measurable worsening of quality of life for the people he is paid to serve. And through all that, this man has held his tongue and not raised his head above the parapet. But the issue of ensuring that children have full bellies and that their families do not have to worry about the spiralling cost of meals is apparently one that he is willing to stand up in public and voice his opposition to. This is something that Óli Björn (and others) are willing to go on the record against and mark his part in Icelandic political history. To not believe that feeding children should be accepted as a bare minumum standard of care and decency in our society. That parents who are already struggling to make ends meet should be forced to scrape and save what little disposable income they have to ensure that their children aren‘t going hungry. And if they can´t afford it? Well i guess then work two jobs and pay the difference? I am well aware that the objections to increases in welfare such as this are always dressed up in political language, jargon and double-speak. The implication that somehow the Icelandic government does not have the money for this, or that it will result in inevitable cuts elsewhere. The debate surrounding free school meals for children is not merely a matter of economics; it's a litmus test for the moral conscience of our leaders. Yet, time and again, we see certain politicians barricading themselves behind bureaucratic jargon and hollow justifications, conveniently forgetting the dire realities faced by countless families struggling to put food on the table. These politicians, ensconced in their ivory towers of privilege, fail to comprehend the harsh truth that for many children, the school lunch may be their only nutritious meal of the day. By denying them this basic necessity, these politicians are complicit in perpetuating a cycle of poverty and hunger that stifles the potential of entire generations. Let's be unequivocal: objecting to free school meals for children is not a political stance; it's a moral failing. It's a betrayal of the fundamental duty of elected officials to safeguard the welfare of their constituents, especially the most marginalized among them. As a British ex-pat, my mind is inevitably drawn to comparisons with my native country, where during the covid-19 lockdowns, the Conservative government refused to feed children who were in lockdown and could not attend school. In that case it took a premier league footballer who started a public awareness campaign to pressure the government into sending food to hungry children. And yes. That is just as dystopian as it sounds. Make no mistake, that same ideaolgy is at work here, Sjalfstæðisflokkurinn are simply a bit further up the road than the British Conservative party. But the end point is the same. As citizens, we must hold these politicians accountable for their abhorrent stance on free school meals. We must demand that they prioritize humanity over politics, empathy over ideology. We must remind them that their duty is to serve the people, not their own self-interests. The author is a manufacturing worker.
Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir Skoðun
Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson Skoðun
Skoðun Kerfislægt virðingarleysi – Þegar sparað er í velferð en verðmæti sameignar renna annað Sigurður Sigurðsson skrifar
Skoðun Maðurinn einn er ei nema hálfur – með öðrum er hann meiri en hann sjálfur Kristín Bjarnadóttir skrifar
Skoðun Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson skrifar
Skoðun Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Heildarkostnaður aðildarviðræðna gæti samsvarað 300–700 kr. á mann á mánuði Valur Þráinsson skrifar
Skoðun Fullveldi, yfirþjóðlegar stofnanir og jafnræðisgrundvöllur í Evrópu Maximilian Conrad skrifar
Skoðun Þurfum við kreatín og prótín sem bætiefni? Jóhanna Eyrún Torfadóttir,Dögg Guðmundsdóttir skrifar
Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir Skoðun
Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson Skoðun